看完《一小时快相》，我想我一定不适合做相片冲印店的店员，就像电影里的西摩，对着一台机器和同样的客人，一做就是11年，那一定需要极大的耐心和丰富的想像力，否则，我可能比他还早就会崩溃，用不着等待意外情况突然降临。

那真是个残酷的职业，11年，照片里反复出现的，是一只又一只猫，一辆又一辆伤痕累累的车，一张又一张婴儿的脸，一个又一个看起来有着同样幸福的家庭。当变态色情狂的恶心照片都不再让他好奇，我不知道，他为什么独独选中了那一家？

自闭，拒绝，黑暗的房间，像个巨大的暗房，孤独慢慢显影，悄然无声。连年幼的杰克都觉得西摩可怜，和妈妈为他祈祷时，我看到冰冷的厨房里，西摩有一刻恍惚。而渴望也异乎寻常地茁壮，想像自己是这个家庭的一分子，穿上旧毛衣，喝灌打开的啤酒，在沙发上眯个眼，再用趟体温尚存的马桶。真实的世界里却处处像在做戏，在跳蚤市场买张年轻女人的黑白相片当作母亲，包里随时装上本同样的小说，只为了假装一切有如偶遇，只为有回短暂的家的感觉。

罗宾•威廉斯，因为特征突出的长相和喜剧天赋，多年来我们只当他是个类型演员，有些喜剧特色的好人、好老师、好医生、好父亲，却突然在2002年一下子为我们献上了两部戏路大变的电影，跟艾尔•帕西诺演对手戏的《失眠》，和这部《一小时快相》，他是唯一的主角。在我有限的视野里，这两部都可以列入美国去年的十佳影片。

也许制片商是会把《一小时快相》定为犯罪片的，可是在很多像我一样的观者眼里，只是丈夫保护家庭，父亲保护儿子。特殊的是，丈夫和父亲的身份都是他一厢情愿地想象罢了，而这就让电影增加了些悲剧的意味，看得人心酸。很多人对这样的日子和欺骗都习以为常了，突然的中断，让人举止失措，连一点点理性的妥协和修复的努力都无从做起，那种伤害原来并不比鲜血淋漓来得轻多少。在被捕的一瞬，他惊惶无措，“我什么都没做，只是拍照片”。照片里，是暗淡的床灯，干燥的浴巾，泛着瓷光的马桶，冷冰冰的钢质水龙头。

电影的结尾很好。其实我还想看一看妻子和母亲会怎样面对这个熟悉的陌生人，但电影结束了，警局里的西摩，被固定在一方透明的玻璃里，像是一张加了框的照片，一切看起来都曝光过度，淡淡的蓝色，光线惨白。这不是生活，而是生活的照片，是我们不经易间被人偷拍到的背影。一个失手，愤怒、孤独都骤然放大，过度的明亮或者过度的恍惚，但你我都知道，那其实是我们的恐惧或者渴望。在《失眠》里，那束光甚至强烈到成了永恒的昼，让一个人彻夜难眠。

       Sy又没有把他收集的照片公布于众或用于任何一种对照片上的人有伤害的用途上，他做的一切只是自己欣赏一个家庭能够拥有的美好。而当他恼怒于油金不珍惜自己的家庭时也并没有作出任何伤害他人的事，有的只是警告和威吓。影片结尾处展开的20张照片给人一种平静而清澈的感觉，还有镜头拉远时审讯室里的Sy，好像在一张纯白底色的照片上。因此，我不明白那些说他变态的人是如何得出的结论。我觉得他的可敬远远超出影片中的任何人。
      当一个人对色彩、对光线严谨得一丝不苟时，他对人也该是挑剔的。当遇到一个完美的家庭时，他对这个家庭的爱和关心甚至超出了对自己的生活。这个人的心灵和做事的初衷洁静的好似影片里超市的蓝白色调和他自己的家。
       影片中这个家庭的幸福和快乐在Sy冲洗的照片上展露无疑，却在现实生活中步履维艰。人们拍下照片除了试图记载那些时刻之外，是否该时常回顾一下，真正给你的人生带来快乐的、你该去珍惜的是什么，而不让美好只保存在相纸上。

Why did a person who develops films pay attention to a family often takes photographs? Why did he give them larger photographs than they requested and camera as presents regardless of losing his job? Why did he teach the husband of the family a lesson when he betrayed his wife, although it meant that he would be taken and kept prisoner with the authority of the law by the police? The film “One Hour Photo” itself, however, didn’t tell us the answers to these questions.

The leading character in the film, Simon, was an old, poor man. He had never been married and he didn’t have children. He had no friends or even just anyone to talk with. He lived alone and felt terribly lonely and uneasy. It was not meaningful for Simon to live in the world. But when he noticed the family which appeared to be happy, something changed. The perfect relationship of this family became Simon’s beautiful dream in heart. He thought that his responsibility was to keep the members of the family happy forever. Simon did a lot of things. Some of them were right while the others might be not appropriate. But it was not important. He made the family members understood something significant in the end and they became Simon’s rare friends all over the world.

After seeing this film, most of us wondered why Simon behave like this. The film didn’t mention it and we didn’t know exactly either. In my opinion, the most possible explanation was that Simon’s parents did something hurt him badly when he was a little boy. Maybe his father betrayed his mother so made his mother and him rather unhappy. So he didn’t believe in marriage and hate men who betrayed their wives. Of course, it’s just my opinion. But it is clear that Simon’s childhood was rather painful.

The child in the film was lucky because Simon came to help him to make his family start again. But he was just a character in the film. In fact, nearly all children who had unhappy families don’t have the chance to regain happiness.

What I want to say is that childhood is quite important to people. Wonderful childhood leads people to a happy and substantial life. On the contrary, painful childhood will make people be tired of life and often think that society owe him so that he will never feel hopeful. As a result, we should give all children carefree childhood. After we got married then become fathers or mothers of our children, we shouldn’t be too selfish. Children are very sensitive to their parents’ behavior. So before we do everything, we must think whether it would hurt our children and what impact we would put on our children first in order not to hurt their feelings. We must try our best to create a good surrounding for our children to grow up healthily and happily in.

又是一段童年阴影，一个Creepy的偷窥者，还有一个濒临破裂的家庭。印象深刻的是所有场景都是那么的一尘不染，纯白，纯蓝，犹如Sy的简单的一成不变的寂寞的生活一般。长期的窥视使得他错误地估计了自己与其他人家庭的距离，而长期的寂寞则让他产生了各种各样不切实际的幻想。虽说是惊悚片，不过我还是不由得对Sy这样一个悲剧性的好市民产生了发自心底的同情，像他这样孤孤单单独自蜷缩在家中一角的悲剧性人物应该在现实生活中也不在少数。
从片子本身来讲，其实有点故弄玄虚，从头至尾一直让你猜那些Scary的东西到底是什么。不过值得称赞的一点是Sy孤寂的感觉表现得不错，Robbin Williams的确是个老戏骨。