Thrusting audience into America’s ‘50s suburbia of contentment, where behind the closed doors, inconceivable horrors lurk within a perfect nuclear family, actor-turned-director Bob Balaban’s first directorial effort PARENTS is a black comedy/horror melange that walks a tight rope in balancing the tonal shifts, and it is satisfactorily effective.
Displaced by his family’s recent move, 10-year-old Michael Laemie (Madorsky) is a gawky kid who inclines to keep to himself, haunted by morbid thoughts and gory nightmares, he begins to suspect his parents (Quaid and Hurt) might be cannibals. Are they or aren’t they? Balaban’s film taunts us with ambivalence, one moment, it appears everything is a figment of Michael’s wildest imagination, but when a slovenly, chain-smoking social worker (Dennis, looks out of sorts) is involved, murderous acts seems veracious.
Balaban’s satirical streak runs amok with a kid’s untrustworthy viewpoint, not least with the cozy but unsettling ending, intimating an affirmative answer to the big question mark hovering inside a viewer’s head. It also provides ample opportunity for him to effect sundry visual techniques - like split focus, 360 degree rotating long takes, black-and-white fuzzy shots, etc. - and horror tropes - a creepy cellar, a room full of cadavers, movable meat sausages, among others.
If the material is irrefutably dark, Oedipus complex is the prime mover behind Michael’s mortal repulsion toward his father, PARENTS also conspicuously basks in the sunny-side of normalcy, accompanied by easy listening tunes and a whiff of breeziness sent by Quaid, Hurt and others. Quaid is exceptionally good as a frustrated father, whose respectable, bland appearance flakes out bit by bit, and when he is pushed beside himself, he can be equally menacing with those chilling eyes behind spectacles; and Hurt adorns her domineering mannerism with exquisite daintiness, she is the mommy dearest to die for.
Largely ignored upon its release, PARENTS is worthy of a resurgence of acknowledgement for its transgressive portrayal of growing pains, or its flippant message to convert carnivores to vegetarians, either way, Balaban’s film is a hoot that sends up the none-too-bizarre bedfellows of respectability and perversion.
referential entries: Paul Bartel’s EATING RAOUL (1982, 6.9/10); Balaban’s BERNARD AND DORIS (2006, 6.5/10).
Title: Parents
Year: 1989
Genre: Comedy, Horror, Mystery
Country: Canada, USA
Language: English
Director: Bob Balaban
Screenwriter: Christopher Hawthorne
Music: Jonathan Elias
Cinematography: Ernest Day, Robin Vidgeon
Editing: Bill Pankow
Cast:
Randy Quaid
Mary Beth Hurt
Bryan Madorsky
Sandy Dennis
London Juno
Kathryn Grody
Deborah Rush
Graham Jarvis
Rating: 6.8/10
这部电影看得我有点乱。
男孩是素食者,讨厌吃肉,觉得父母吃肉都是血淋淋的,血红的。
刚开始看到他把父母做爱时母亲的嘴巴联想到食肉时,我还以为这是男孩性启蒙时因为对性认知不足,而产生的神秘惧怕,而后续的一系列事件都是基于此而产生的幻觉呢!
结果看了一半才发现,父母真的是食人族,竟然是我想多了?整部片子就…还挺莫名其妙的,像是本来要揭示点儿什么,最后掀开帘子却发现也就那样的感觉。
不过除去剧本的糟糕体验,整部剧的镜头把握的很好,连带着布局色彩和光线也鲜活了起来。
想到弗洛伊德的理论
https://www.bilibili.com/video/av47579081这不是喜剧片吧,一点都不觉得好笑。在这样的家庭长大,这孩子心理有问题,成年之后也许会不正常。https://www.bilibili.com/video/av49711396儿子从没吃过肉,因为父母从不买肉,可家里却每天有肉吃https://www.bilibili.com/video/BV1BK4y1C79g
不知道《约书亚》是否受到这部电影视角上的启发,我个人是联想在一起了,基本八十年代末的影像风格,现在看起来有些伤心悦目,这也算是调色和心理有一种互动,这个电影没有什么卖弄感,这一点使我觉得很友好,难得的将心理暗示等等元素就是在故事中讲出来,不去做特别多的卖弄式的解读,所以影片反而有一种温柔的美。
导演玩深沉玩崩了吧?文艺的莫名其妙,真要睡着
如果说梦是无意识得以显现之所,而无意识又是被主体压抑的结果,那无意识或梦也就不在是某种虚幻的假象,恰恰相反,它(梦)是某种现实的映射。另外男孩目视到父母的性爱场景,这在男孩的世界与眼中,其与食人的父母同样是不可理解与不可知的,而这两种不可知在男孩的脑中相互交融,在梦中在无意识中重复着体验着,使其陷入焦虑与恐惧当中。
重金属超标的肉酱~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~(⊙o⊙)哦~
始终觉得是在讲一个孩子的童年幻想,里面厨房水池里跳舞的手和冰箱上流下的血如果是在我小时候看大概会害怕好久吧。里面妈妈好漂亮,音乐真不错
节奏有点太慢了,以及结尾硬是主持了正义有点刻意(不喜欢...。),除此之外真的是一个挺可爱的中产家庭背景氛围恐怖片。
如果把结局拍成男孩的臆想 就成了儿童精神分析学的范本 对父母性爱和肉类的恐惧投射 表现主义手法展示男孩的梦境和心理对于父亲的抵触 和父亲总作为施暴方的形象出现 也算是为弗洛伊德性学背书 末段处理得太过模糊 挥动曲棍球杆和棒球杆的特写组接严重误导 血红色镜头和配乐不错
#吃人爸妈#以小孩视角讲了一个黑色童话故事,很有《闪灵》的范儿。自闭内向迷离梦境,人肉包子,爸妈异类,黑暗中盯着天花板的裂缝织造恐惧。或许每个人都有那么一段童年梦魇。本片镜头也相当出色,复古优雅的画面基调,轻松诙谐的配乐(用@QQ音乐 摇了几首),刚好反衬主题的迷幻怪异。不错的心理片~
8/10 陰暗,極具幽默感,濃厚且多元化的隱喻及象徵,高強度的情感表達,非常有趣!目前看過唯一憑藉電影本身給出的所有線索仍無從判斷導演意圖的複雜劇情片;如果鏡頭角度給得再漂亮些,完全可以9/10。DVD的導演短訪談中對於幾種真相的設定非常有意思。
To me It's about childhood fears, anxieties and tensions with parents. The music and the set are brilliant. And it's a very unique role Randy played, among his typical drunk father(but with love from daughter)..
50年代的恐惧症,片中的梦境拍摄的实在是迷幻啊~~~~~~
把对成人世界里父母的性爱当做恐惧的来源,对应幻想成食人的可怖,再添加小女孩的恐吓式洗脑,无知的孩子仿佛陷入了不知所措的泥潭中。可原本营造的所谓幻觉并非幻觉。当父母真的在吃人,那孩子所遇见一切的场景会是多么可怕。
6.0 和yad在毛概课一起看的。一边听俊奎教授讲段子一边看的。看完我说“很无聊”,他说“看不懂”。老师说“印度的星巴克杯子小。”
一个小孩因为挑食导致父母惨死的悲剧故事【根本不是。幻想和现实区分度太小,看得糊里糊涂。
剧情不用深究就是一部荒诞小品
配乐和色彩都很棒 浓浓的50S Feel 节奏不太好 前半段快看不下去 这哪里“黑色幽默”了? 明明是一个有俄狄浦斯情结的正宗恐怖片好吗 只不过真相体现得有些模棱两可
很喜欢,画面风格、颜色、镜头等。孩子眼里的世界是直接的,是什么就是什么,没有社会礼仪和教化的蹩脚解释,也没有硬生生的自以为的幽默感,所以当一个孩子发现父母的饮食异样、行为异样,他会怀疑并不断恐惧。很多被忽视的细节都将影响一个孩子的成长。
父母皆祸害真人版,另一个观摩杀人魔的绝佳角度