1 ) 塞尔玛
历史传记题材电影《塞尔玛》由阿娃·杜威内执导,蒂姆·罗斯、大卫·奥伊罗、小库珀·古丁、汤姆·威尔金森主演,影片聚焦美国民权斗士马丁·路德·金1965年组织的“由塞尔玛向蒙哥马利进军”行动。我看过了我看过了我看过了我看过了我看过了我看过了我看过了我看过了我看过了我看过了我看过了我看过了我看过了我看过了我看过了我看过了
2 ) 不瘟不火
总是把马丁路德跟马丁路德金搞混了,为了加深自己对这个美国著名民权人士的印象,很高兴的看了他的自传式电影。有关美国黑人人权的电影也很多了,在这里也要提到一个人马克西姆X,也在本片中露脸。关于马克西姆也有一部自传式电影《黑潮》,原名就叫马克西姆X。马丁路德金是个温和派的领导者,虽然他们俩被暗杀的命运是一样的,但是我觉得马丁路德金是正确的。仇恨和冲突并不能让彼此的关系变得更好,就像今日缺乏马丁路德金这种领袖的美国,也依然不断爆发出种族矛盾的骚乱。在这里更要提到一部电影《美国X档案》爱德华诺顿主演的,就是对仇恨所产生的原因进行了反省,就是因为白人和黑人之间没有真正的和解。
3 ) 塞尔玛
影片集中讲述的是在马丁路德金推动领导下的塞尔玛大游行及其后美国投票权法案的通过历程,有着满满的正能量,在如今种族矛盾仍比较尖锐的美国来说是有不少现实意义。但从中看到的美国政法体制的改革与推动却是有多处值得借鉴及思考,政府允许什么形式的、什么程度的民主诉求,媒体如何可以做到在什么底线上的新闻自由,司法可以做到什么程度的独立,进而政客可以有多少程度的牵制与敬畏,从而促出符合民意及历史规律的条文,而这,几乎是环环相扣。但是,却没有普遍性,只是时势造英雄,严厉点说,这事放在美国是有可推崇的进步意义,而放在其他国家就是需要借鉴而必须严防的,而这部《selma》,最终也只是美国文化的又一次失败侵袭。
4 ) 美国选举权议题上再起抗争
得克萨斯州议会民主党议员以集体逃离首府奥斯汀的戏剧性方式抵制共和党力推的选举法改革,类似的举动在全美至少有十多个州已经或正在施行,其州议会全都由共和党人士掌控。修改选举法的用意并不错,包括防止选举欺诈、保障选举过程的完整性与公正性,问题在于这些可能的差错都源自想象,美国联邦和州一级的实际选举运作中并未系统发生过欺诈。按照目前多个州的方案,实际造成的结果是提高投票门槛,尤其在选民登记、身份证件、邮寄投票、提前投票等环节。
所有这些调整对我参与投票不太可能造成任何影响,但有少部分选民会因此受到阻碍,他们未必有灵活的工作时间、方便的交通工具、基本胜任的语言能力,他们也不一定生活在种族关系更为包容的东西两个海岸或者都市区。
电影《塞尔玛》(Selma, 2014)为了解美国公民履行投票权的抗争提供了历史样本,故事发生在1960年代初民权运动在南方逐渐展开的时候。电影开头,欧普拉·温芙瑞扮演的黑人护士安妮到阿拉巴马州法庭完成选民登记,申请表格的“种族”栏里填写的是“Negro”,这个词因歧视意味现在已经不再使用。
她看上去需要深呼吸以后才能调集勇气,捧着表格走到登记窗口。
白人登记员通过心理暗示设置了第一道障碍,“你为老人院的杜恩先生工作,对吧?”
安妮:“对”。
白人登记员:“如果我告诉杜恩先生他的护士在这惹麻烦,不知道他会说什么。”
安妮:“我没有要惹任何麻烦,我只是要完成选民登记。”
接下来登记员要求安妮背诵美国宪法的序言。我对美国政治和历史有一丁点了解,但只能说出序言的开头”我们合众国人民”(We The People of the United States),其他内容可以大致讲出来,无法做到准确背诵。在中国做学生时强记路线、方针、政策、计划的能力到了美国已经基本丧失,这里基本上“转述”(paraphrase)清楚就行,无需标准文本。
安妮可以,她一字一句背诵出完整的宪法序言,“我们合众国人民,为建立更完善的联盟,树立正义,保障国内安宁,提供共同防务,促进公共福利...”。
白人书记员此时已经知道安妮完整背诵不存在任何问题,所以立即打断她,并设置新的障碍,“阿拉巴马州有多少县一级的法官?”
安妮再次深呼吸以后回答,“67个。”
白人书记员紧接着要求,“他们的名字?”
谁能记住67个县级法官的名字?安妮因此无法完成选民登记。
这种刁难在国内不容易见到,因为并不知道有谁实际参加过选民登记。但想象一下,如果一对新人去民政局领结婚证,办事员冷不丁地发问,政治局有多少成员?特别熟悉国家大事的少数年轻人或许知道“25”这个答案。但如果办事员接着要求背诵所有成员的名字,否则无法领取结婚证呢?中国一定会出现大面积的晚婚晚育。
安妮或许好几代都生长于美国,她完成选民登记需要经历爬雪山过草地般的艰辛,成年以后才移民过来的我做同样的事情却如同水桶里抓鱼一样手到擒来。马里兰州的选民登记表格只有一页,填写内容非常简单,包括年龄、是否美国公民、性别、出生日期、家庭地址、联系方式等基本信息,引起我注意的是表格的第九项“政党”,说明文字为“为了参加初选和政党大会,你必须完成登记。”无需介绍人、漫长的考核期、一次又一次的思想汇报,我只需要在“民主党、共和党、面包与玫瑰党、独立身份和其他党派”5个选项中找一个划勾就算入了党。表格寄出后就会收到马里兰选举委员会的确认信,自此以后我就成为登记选民,有权在联邦、州和地方的政治选举中投票,过程简单方便。
安妮的选民登记之难与新移民选民登记之易,最粗略地概括,几十年民权、平权、选举权运动的历史性努力起着关键作用。地理因素也很重要,自由派聚集的都会区与南方偏乡有很大不同。针对共和党在州一级开展的选举法改革,民主党人士以“开历史倒车”回应,包括拜登在内。有的说这是要退至南方推行种族隔离的Jim Crow时代,更有语出惊人者说是要退回到1860年代的美国内战,电影《塞尔玛》中马丁·路德·金等人带着安妮们勇敢抗争获得的权力有可能略微缩水。
5 ) 写在颁奖礼前夜
第87届奥斯卡金像奖颁奖典礼将在明天早上举行,而直到前一天完上我才看了这部电影。睁大眼睛、竖起耳朵,仔仔细细地在没有字幕的情况下看完这部电影。总觉得不能在颁奖礼之后才去看这部获得奥斯卡最佳影片提名的电影。
在我的心里好电影一直有一个标准:一部好电影要讲好一个好故事。举几个我喜欢而且大家比较熟悉的例子:《暴雨将至》《低俗小说》《卧虎藏龙》《大鱼》《本杰明·巴顿奇事》《纳德和西敏:一次别离》。《塞尔玛》是部好电影,它讲了一个好故事:MLK引领众人去完成一个伟大的梦想。千万不要把这个故事单单理解为MLK带领大家搞民权运动,用游行示威的方式争取选举权。
不过,这部电影好像没有完全讲好这个好故事,我在这里点出两个问题。第一,虽然主角表演很卖力,但配角比主角还惊艳,每个黑人演员表演也很卖力,万万没想到蒂姆·罗斯会饰演州长George Wallace,一出来就那贱贱的样儿。第二,虽然剧情很流畅,但总觉得叙事结构和叙事方式略显单调,而且对这段历史不太了解的国内观众很可能会觉得这部电影有些无聊,比如有的观众会问“I have a dream去哪儿了”,好在配乐对其有所弥补。
另外,这部电影在美国上映时正遇到了弗格森事件等一系列涉嫌种族歧视事件的社会问题,电影结尾曲也提到了弗格森(本人很喜欢John Legend)。广大爱好和平、民主和正义的美国人也正需要这样一部《塞尔玛》去安抚受伤的心灵,在美国好评如潮情理之中。啰嗦一句,可惜啊!贾樟柯的《天注定》······
(PS: 这是本人第一篇豆瓣影评,近来豆瓣水军太多,不喜勿喷。)
6 ) Response to Selma
Response to Selma
Last week, I went to see the movie Selma in the theater. The reason I went to watch this movie is not because I wanted to watch it, but because I needed to get the extra credit for my EWRT 2 English class. Before I went to the theater, I watched the trailer of this movie, so I basically knew that this movie was about Martin Luther King, Jr. I only knew a little bit about Martin Luther King, Jr., who was the leader in the African-American Civil Rights Movement and delivered his famous “I have a Dream” speech. I guessed that the movie might be about what happened before and after Martin Luther King, Jr.’s famous speech. After watching the movie, I was surprised because this movie talked more about the speech, and it made me feel touched since it talked about the conflicts, struggles, and feelings of people. I think Selma is an amazing and meaningful movie to watch because of its story, actors, and emotion.
The story of this movie talked about how African American people fought for their voting right and freedom by expressing conflicts between different positions of people and feelings of them, so I think this movie is a meaningful movie. In the movie, it basically talked about how Martin Luther King, Jr. appealed to Congress to pass the bill in order to protect the voting right of African American people. Besides, the movie showed a few main characters of the movement in the past, such as, Martin Luther King, Jr., his wife, the thirty-sixth president of the United States, Lyndon B. Johnson, and the governor of Alabama, George Wallace, etc. There were scenes that were showing speeches, demonstrations, and the brutal repressions of police. In addition, there were political conflicts between many different groups of people, such as Martin Luther King, Jr.’s non-violent movement, leaders of students, the President Lyndon B. Johnson’s white house, Alabama’s governor George Wallace, and the police of Selma. Since this movie talks about African Americans fought for their freedom and the right to vote, which is an important political history to Americans; also, people should watch this movie and learn more about Martin Luther King, Jr. and his movement.
Selma not only has a good story, but also has a group of amazing actors who tried their best to successfully act their characters. David Oyelowo is the actor who played the role of Martin Luther King, Jr. I do not know how the real Martin Luther King, Jr. looks like. Even though Oyelowo did not particularly copy Martin Luther King, Jr., the way that he gave out the speech had the feeling and momentum of the real Martin Luther King, Jr. Also, Oyelowo really focused on some small details of Martin Luther King, Jr., which made me feel like that Oyelowo was exactly the Martin Luther King, Jr. in the movie. Moreover, Tim Roth played the role of the governor of Alabama, George Wallace. Also, Roth played this character successfully, and some words that he said make me laugh. Besides, the version of Tom Wilkinson’s President Lyndon B. Johnson is very good (“Selma (2014) Full Cast & Crew”). In the movie, President Lyndon B. Johnson became one of resistance of the bill advancing because the movie showed that the right to vote was not his primary political issues and goals, and he thought that Martin Luther King, Jr.’s movement hindered his agenda. However, he started to support what Martin Luther King, Jr. did and said after hearing the criticism and encouragement from Martin Luther King, Jr. In my opinion, Wilkinson did a great job of playing his version of President Lyndon B. Johnson. I think the President actually wanted to pass the legislation, but he did not have enough power to do it, and Martin Luther King, Jr. gave him the power or enlarged his power to pass the bill. Furthermore, there were a lot of powerful supporting actors, such as the film producer Oprah played a supporting character who wanted to vote, but could not vote in the movie. Also, Cuba Gooding Jr. acted a lawyer who only showed up twice in the movie. Even though there are many famous actors who played supporting characters in the movie, I think they did a good job to expressing each character’s emotions, and I respect them. Therefore, this movie Selma has a group of powerful and famous actors, and they all did a good job to perform in this movie.
The movie Selma is an amazing movie, and it made a lot of people feel touched. When I went into the theater, there were a lot of African Americans and a few white people, and there were some Asian people like me. I could not pay my attention at the beginning of the movie because an African American little girl who sat in the front row kept laughing. When Tim Roth showed up at the scene, she laughed even harder than before. I did not know this girl, and I had no idea what she laughed about. Suddenly, I heard an old man walked up to her and said to the little girl, “Little girl, you better be quiet. I have been waiting this movie for many years.” I could feel how much the old man cared about this movie, and I knew that he really wanted to watch this movie carefully and intently. Also, I was glad that the little girl did not laugh again, so I could pay my attention on the movie. After two and a half hours, the movie ended with John Legend’s new song Glory, which was a nice song because I think this song helped me understand the feelings of the movie better. Suddenly, I saw the old man stood up, and he said out loud, “Remember Michael Brown, Remember Eric Garner. Our parade is not over yet.” I did not know this old man, and I did not really pay attention to what he said about. I thought this movie encouraged him something. Later, I did some research about what the old man said, and I found out that the two names that he mentioned were two African Americans who were dead because of some unfair reasons. Therefore, this movie made people sympathy because some people knew the feeling of inequality of people of color; also, I am an Asian, and some white people have treated me unfairly or looked down at me.
This amazing movie not only made people touched, but also made me sympathy. In fact, I cried and laughed while I was watching the movie. Sometimes, there were funny scenes and dialogues that made me laugh right after some scenes made me cried. The reason I became sympathy about this movie is not only because of its powerful speech and memorable scenes, but also because I could directly feel the sadness, fear, anger, or determinations of the characters in the movie. I could see the struggles of how people fought for their freedom and equality and the feeling of how they really wanted the right to vote and freedom. Each actor put lots of emotions and effort to perform the characters, and each staff who worked behind the scenes tried their best to produce an amazing movie. Also, the background music helped me a lot to understand the feelings of the scenes. Therefore, staffs and actors put a lot of efforts into the movie, and they produced a wonderful movie that truly expresses the emotions of each character in the movie., which made me touched.
From my point of view, I think people should go to watch this movie Selma because of its story, a group of powerful actors who accomplished their tasks on performing each character, and a group of staffs who put many efforts into the movie. This movie talked about an important political history that Martin Luther King, Jr. led a group of people to fight for the right to vote and freedom of African American. Also, there were a lot of powerful and famous actors who played main or supporting characters in the movie, and all of them perfectly accomplished their jobs to express each character’s feeling. Furthermore, staffs behind the scenes put music, set up the scenes, and edited the movie in order to make the movie powerful and emotional. Therefore, I think this movie is a very meaningful movie, and we should produce more movies like Selma.
Work Cited
“Selma (2014) Full Cast & Crew” Imdb. IMDb.com, Inc., 2014. Web. 14 March 2015.
有些人天生就是演讲型人格。追求自由,永不停歇。
这种叫做正确,不叫政治正确
3.5. vs Lincoln-2012 、Mandela: Long Walk to Freedom-2013,过程都是比较流水账的,阵容和结尾动人。
尽管全片对赛尔玛大游行的再现极其生动且感人,但仍然不能掩盖角色塑造的单薄乏力,为数不多的几个配乐场景的煽情用力过猛。三星半
在美国的电影院的观影结束后 我经历了人生中全体观众为一部电影掌声雷动 我是个愚昧的观众 不关心所谓的政治正确奥斯卡脸谱化 我只知道五十年后的今天 我可以和白人黑人共同在同一个舒适的电影院看到这部电影 这就是金博士和当时所有有良知的美国人的胜利
挺真实的
很不错了呢
出得太是时候了
喜欢它的摄影和配乐 主人公精彩的演绎使得主旋律更加深入人心 更有震慑力和感染力
众星捧月... 政治任务很重,黑人演员们都是在呕心沥血的演啊... 林登·约翰逊对内的政绩不错,就是越战搞得很失败。这部片也顺便把他吹捧了一遍。4星
拍得中规中矩,适合用来了解历史参照当下。“If anyone had a right to believe that this democracy did not work, and could not work, it was those Americans. Our ancestors. They were on the receiving end of a democracy that had fallen short all their lives. And yet, instead of giving up, they joined together and said somehow, some way, we are going to make this work.”
在电影院里直接Déjà vu了,实在是太套路化的民权片啊,恍恍惚惚就像看过一样。 其实美国现在的种族问题也没改观啊,看弗格森骚乱的起因,和60年代有差吗?(烂番茄98%的“政治正确”真让人反感...)
非常四平八稳,但对于塞尔玛游行细致而尽量克制的刻画仍有着极为动人的力量。虽说是主旋律政治正确,但比预期要好。
每年金球奥斯卡都有这种主旋律八股文电影入选,当然也拍得不错,但按部就班四平八稳的没什么特色。很多地方看得犯困。电影尽量煽情,马丁自己在上面讲得热血沸腾,唾沫横飞的,但我希望更多地通过电影细节呈现,而不是煽情那些freedom民主people之类的演讲口号,否则真是看得厌倦了。最后的歌曲Glor
history professor 说 lyndon johnson 其实是 pro-civil rights
重现65年马丁路德金的“塞尔玛游行”,几十英里的路,真的由他们的鲜血铺成... 虽然为了突出King的伟人特质,其他的政客都被或多或少地脸谱化了(尤其总统林顿约翰逊),但看见那么多真实的人在为了自己的宪法权利不惜流血牺牲,实在感动!如果说这也是“主旋律”,那我愿意看更多这种的
每一次游行都描绘得非常安静,却透露出决心之大的壮烈。82岁的老头看着如何叫人不心酸。King的演讲爆发着力量,配上黑人的音乐,足够的冲击。
又一曲只会抬头45度角仰望伟人的脸谱化主旋律赞歌
马丁路德金坚持的是黑人和白人之间的和平,他也不讨厌白人,而本片充斥着敌对,把白人都刻画成恶,我觉得这是不对的。加上,这整部电影,从表演到配乐等等都是如此的平庸,不过大卫·奥伊罗的MLK演的不错,演讲戏是唯一的看点。
恕我直言,跟豆瓣的“主旋律”——但凡涉及与强权作斗争及民权运动的题材(比如韩国民主运动、女权运动、同性恋平权运动、去年的《华盛顿邮报》)就普遍过誉的情形相比,本片不仅分数低于IMDb还被不少人污名化为“政治正确”,这背后隐含的,是某些国人对黑人族群莫名其妙又根深蒂固的偏见与歧视。