哈克特(哥伦布·绍特 Columbus Short 饰)、拜尼斯(劳伦斯·菲什伯恩 Laurence Fishburne 饰)、杜比斯(斯基特·乌尔里奇 Skeet Ulrich 饰)、潘梅尔(阿莫里·诺拉斯科 Amaury Nolasco 饰)几个人都任职于一个保安公司。每天的工作就是开着荷枪实弹的装甲车负责押运上千万的现款。大家最近都面临着一个严峻问题——缺钱,于是几个人不免开始动起了歪脑筋。虽然哈克特不情愿,不过其他人的威逼利诱下,他最终还是半推半就的加入了该计划,他们的目标是:打劫自己押运的4200万现金。有老朋友同时也是这方面的行家奎因(让·雷诺饰)帮忙,事情进行得相当顺利。不过在实施计划的当天,一切在计划中的事情突然被一件意外之事打断:有人开枪打死了一个无辜的流浪汉。哈克特因此想退出因而和众人产生了分歧。原本看似坚固的兄弟之情,因为这起意外而开始产生裂痕……
【英语影视欣赏课作业。因为作业交上去老师就不发下来了,所以传上来备个份,以免以后找不到。未经修改,大概会有很多错误><。。。】 I believe many people,after seeing this movie---Armored,will have their thumbs up and show their admiration and worship of the hero generously.They may use all those beautiful words,such as 'He is the outstanding representative of human nature.' or 'What he has done vividly illustrate that justice always prevails evil.' But I hold a different opinion. As for me,I would not speak highly of his behaviors at all.Let's think back to the movie.I feel fairly strange that why the hero suddenly gave up the crime and wanted to save the old man even if he knew that they had done the crime and would be accused of not only robbery but also murder if it was exposed.Did he turn from a devil into an angel all of a sudden?I don't think so.Perhaps the truth is that he did all the things deliberately. We could clearly see from the movie that the hero got in a dilemma because of lack of money.Therefore,it's nature that he was eager to get more money from the robbery,even all of them,if possible.The instant he saw one of his criminal soulmates shot the old man,he realized that the opportunity was coming.So he decided to stand this excellent chance to kill all his partners and then,possessed all the money left.That's what we see in the end:the hero got everything---a reward,the rest of money(maybe not much,because they had been burnt to ash),and most important---his brother.If what I say above is the truth,then the hero of this movie is no longer a hero,and he was ont worth any praise. However,I have to admit the 'truth' is not obvioiusly shown in the movie and it's based on my imagination and reasoning.Anyway,even if he didn't do that by design,I still insist on my initial viewpoint that his behaviors didn't touch me and to the contrary,they made me disappointed and irritated.He protected that so-called justice at cost of 5 lives of his partners.He asked all to promise not to do harm to anyone,but it is just himself who lead everyone to death.If I were given the chance to speak to the hero,I would put it like this:'Hi,man,remember that you are a criminal but not a good Samaritan.You are a robber man but not Spiderman.The world does not need your rescue;what indeed need your rescue are your dear friends. ' Oh,yes,yes,I nearly forget to say that I feel quite sorry for those 5 sacrificed men.But they were bound to fail now that they were in company with that GREAT guy.Their story tells us how important it is to choose a NORMAL teammate.
我草泥马的。你个大狗蓝的。好久没看到这么窝心的片子。宁当好贼,不做忠狗。
全是因為想看Columbus Short,3分都是給他的。
可能美国佬的思维模式跟咱真的不一样, 一堆的好演员,都很MAN,结果搞出来个混蛋片子……难道是我不理解美式价值观?
http://movie.douban.com/review/3086042/,影评写得十分深刻,可惜原谅我实在是资质太差。希望如某人说的,导演剪辑版是个完全不一样的好看电影。
动作场面一般,剧情张力很够。虽然很多人都骂脑残,但回过味想想,引发这么大争议的影片,是不是该推荐大家看看?三星半吧。
这群笨蛋啊(还有个CSI~~~),搞成这样,漏洞错误百出,就这种计划这种队伍,能成功就怪了,还有一点不能理解,为什么最后还要给他嘉奖?至少判个损坏美元罪~~~也就值个两星吧,给三星,是因为至少大牌们也都很辛苦,至少想了无数种奇妙的的结尾也没猜到使这种结尾~~~
还不错,有这么多大牌儿搀和的片子,可是题材不单调老套些吗?故事节奏很紧张,小苏的表现也差强人意,不过工厂和医院的选景到不错!
大烂片。主角说“我要做好人!”……于是弟兄都挂了。
动作惊悚片带着道德观就没法看了。总体而言还是渐入佳境的,猛男们演技发挥余地确实不大就是了,但欧洲导演就连动作片的分镜构图也挺讲究啊
教训,团伙犯罪一定要找心理素质好,智商高的人,最重要的是要有坚定不移的犯罪思想,以免内讧。
老黑客孟菲斯胖的脖子都没了 老杀手莱昂老的都有些痴呆了 明星不少 可惜剧本太弱
差点儿没给气抽过去,主角儿害死n多无辜的人
就像林语堂老先生说得那句名言一样,这保安简直是中国长大的
看得真尼玛憋屈,一只黑驴,把一群人都黑了!艹螳螂捕蝉,黄雀在后,这世道太他妈黑了啊。让我们这么纯的人可怎么活啊,防不胜防啊。
打分的时候有一肚子话想说,看完大家的评论才知道我想说的都被说了~哈哈哈哈哈~!
1. 抢劫这种事跟拍电影一样,不专业还真的不行. 2. 让 雷诺彻底沦为背景帝
不晓得该不该说是烂片一部,本来想打两星甚至是一星的,不过看在让.雷诺的份上,还是三星了。剧情编得太弱智,拍摄成本相当的低下,估计投资大部分是为了请卡司。事情发展和剧情的进展相当不逻辑正常。听说要在内地上映,不晓得票房多少。另外,觉得那个当叛徒的家伙怎么这么讨厌呢?谁的编剧。以上。
一帮老爷们演了一部主旋律大烂片。
其实很期待劫匪成功的,真TMD,那混球真坏事,看的人起鸡皮疙瘩!
三星给除煞比外冤死的人!!!!!!!p.s.队长会不会就是这样活下来的.....