• 点击色块切换皮肤

    归途路迢迢

    战争片美国1940

    主演:约翰·韦恩  托马斯·米切尔  伊恩·亨特  

    导演:约翰·福特

    播放地址

    猜你喜欢

     剧照

    归途路迢迢 剧照 NO.1归途路迢迢 剧照 NO.2归途路迢迢 剧照 NO.3归途路迢迢 剧照 NO.4归途路迢迢 剧照 NO.5归途路迢迢 剧照 NO.6
    更新时间:2023-09-01 12:55

    详细剧情

    1940年,英国船只SS格伦凯恩号上的一众船员,正在为这艘船从西印度群岛到巴尔的摩再到英国的危险航行做准备。

     长篇影评

     1 ) 船员的宿命

    2023.04.28

    又一部约翰·韦恩主演的电影,但是韦恩在这部电影里主演却不出彩,像个打酱油的,反而是他身边的几个“歪瓜裂枣”倒是神采奕奕,光鲜夺目。据说原剧本是在第一次世界大战时撰写的,这部电影把它放在了二战初期的1940年,且同年拍摄上映,可谓没有时间距离感。

    1940年,停泊在西印度群岛的英国船只SS格伦凯林号货轮准备去美国装载军火运到英国去,为了安抚船员,船长允许当地的姑娘们上船来卖水果,结果她们私带了很多朗姆酒,船员们喝多了酒后兴奋起来,寻欢作乐,唱歌跳舞,接着打起群架来,还把一个船员捅伤,真是敬酒不吃吃罚酒,气的船长取消了这个特许活动。

    船员们得知船上装载了大量的TNT炸药后顿时炸了锅,这可是当时最强悍的烈性炸药,这时船长召集大家开会,许诺船到伦敦后加薪25%,大家顿时一点意见都没有了,真的是人为财死,鸟为食亡。不过还是有个叫史密斯的船员试图逃跑,结果没有逃出码头就被岸上的警察抓住送了回来。格伦凯林号遭遇大风暴,亚克负了重伤,弥留之际流露出对生命的渴望,但是在大海中航行的船上,缺医少药,负伤就意味着死亡,最后亚克还是不治身亡,船长和全体船员按照惯例海葬了他。

    一直不合群的史密斯引起了大家的猜测,尤其是打开窗户偷偷把一个酒瓶子扔海里被人发现,怀疑他是德国间谍在给德国潜艇发信号,众人把他绑了起来,打开他那个神秘的黑盒子,里面是一叠信,德里斯科读了两封信就再也读不下去了,这是一个叫伊丽莎白的妻子写给丈夫的信,这个叫汤姆的丈夫有三个孩子和一个幸福的家,因丢了官职而离家出走,妻子的信中充满悲伤和哀愁,更期待他活着归来。但是史密斯终于没能活着回家,他死于德国飞机的扫射,他妻子和两个孩子来到码头接他,结果悲伤的离开。

    欧里离开家在海上漂泊了十年,每次船靠岸他都和大多数船员一样在酒吧里喝的酩酊大醉,直到把辛辛苦苦赚来的钱花光,再次上船赚辛苦钱,这次他拿到两年的工钱后决定上岸后一滴酒不沾,直接回家投资买个农场安顿下来。俗话说不怕贼偷就怕贼惦记,终于到了英国上岸的欧里左防右放,还是没防住,在一个叫乔的酒吧被劫,遭人算计,差点被人掳走,幸亏兄弟们出手相救,才得以平安回家,但是德里斯克却不幸代他被那艘船员们戏称恶魔船的“阿米达”号掳走,最终在海上被德国潜艇的鱼雷击沉。

    见多识广的格伦凯林号船长料事如神,货轮即将起航时候,花光了钱的船员们一个个的又灰溜溜的回到了船上,这就是大多数船员们的宿命,走不出去的怪圈,一辈子的悲惨命运。正像片尾所述“像欧里一样的人来来回回,像德里斯科一样的人生生死死,像亚克和史密斯一样的人留下了回忆”。

     2 ) 很不错的一部电影

    John Ford的一部关于sailer的黑白经典。
    So men like Ole come and go,and the Driscolls live and die,and the Yanks and Smittys leave their memories-but for the others the long voyage never ends.

     3 ) [Film Review] The Grapes of Wrath (1940) and The Long Voyage Home (1940)

    In 1940, there are two John Ford pictures,THE GRAPES OF WRATH and THE LONG VOYAGE HOME, entering the Oscar race (with 7 and 6 nominations respectively including BEST PICTURE), the former won him the second of his unsurpassable record of 4 wins in BEST DIRECTOR category.

    As of today, THE GRAPES OF WRATH has retained its renown as an irrefutable American classic, sourced from Nobel winner John Steinbeck’s seminal novel censuring the capitalistic exploitation to the have-nots, viz. the Depression-era displaced Oklahoman sharecroppers who are forced to leave their dust-ridden native lands to seek sustenance in the California, the land of honey and milk.

    Their exodus is encapsulated by the Joads family, starting as a family of 12, they trundle a jalopy through various migrant camps, buffeted by hardship, maltreatment and bereavements. When they finally fetches up in a clean camp conspicuously organized by the ministry of agriculture, they cannot credit their luck. Ford and his scribe Nunnally Johnson dull the edge of Steinbeck’s stark depiction with a more sanguine prospect, a self-policing grassroots community can outfox the corrupted authority and downplay the “red scare” that is very prominent in the novel (anyone who dares to demand fair wage is gauged as a “red”?).

    Viewed as a cracking poverty porn, THE GRAPES OF WRATH possesses that reassuring tact of resisting overplaying the story’s mawkish sentimentality, if your highest tolerance is famished kids begging for food, you’re in for an easy ride. Visually and sonically, it shows up Ford’s directorial sway and cinematographer Gregg Toland’s striking chiaroscuro ambience in the highest order, the murkiness of inequity revs up against the howling wind and shadow-scape.

    Henry Fonda received his first Oscar nomination for his devoted portrayal of Tom Joad, the ex-con whose propensity for violence makes him an easy mark, and Fonda utilizes his four-squareness to max out great fortitude and curdled indignation, finally, his extraordinary application culminates in the crescendo where he speechifies Steinbeck’s hyperbolic manifesto of social justice with flying colors, the delivery’s virtuousness is so sweeping that even the most cynical mind could only be cowed by its eloquence and grandeur. By the same token, Jane Darwell, who plays the matronly Ma Joad, won an Oscar for her stirring, full-blown oratory that is often esteemed as the highest achievement of theatrics, her “we are the people” valediction is an irrefragable mood-boosting coda that hits the bull’s-eye.

    But one must contend, a singularly exceptional John Carradine is left unsung as the lapsed preacher Jim Casy, a messianic figure who has to be sacrificed to illuminate the multitude, Carradine’s cragginess fascinatingly jars with Casy’s angelic innocuousness and selfless sagacity, he might have lost his faith, but the aureola of benediction never deserts him.

    THE LONG VOYAGE HOME, whose soundstage artificiality does vitiate the plausibility of an open-sea voyage, concatenates four Eugene O’Neal’s seafaring plays into one feature by Dudley Nichols, and Toland’s groundbreaking prestidigitation of coaxing light and shade again is the main star here, creating a pre-film noir atmosphere of mist, ambiguity and desolation, often on a dime.

    The story is a tetralogy roughly consisted of a roisterous comedy of brawl and exotic girls, a treacherous waterborne adventurer, a WWII paranoia thriller and a blokeish escapade onshore, as a result its prevailing tone fails to cohere, the film feels haphazard, episodic, most of its time unengaged. The comical part is a mess, Ford is ill at ease with frivolity, the studio-bound finitude (a waterlogged deck mostly) doesn’t broaden his imagination of nature’s elemental ferocity and all the commotion around a hidden German spy among the crew leans to preposterousness.

    Luckily, at audience’s pleasure, the ship crew onboard makes do what is at their disposal: Barry Fitzgerald is a vividly fussy steward named Cocky, who looks so far from a sea dog, you might expect him to take a pratfall just by entering the forecastle; John Qualen as Axel, has the most maddening foreign accent but you may forgive him for his earnest (he also shines in a cameo in THE GRAPES OF WRATH, you can see his range); Ian Hunter is the loner harboring a secret disgrace, and Ward Bond is generously allotted a lengthy part when his Yank is in extremis.

    A young Wayne unconvincingly plays a Swede named Olsen, looks wet behind the ears and only too naive to fall prey to skulduggery on the land (Natwick, a celluloid debutante, has a small but striking appearance as a reluctant decoy), he is humbled by a more world-savvy Driscoll (Mitchell), the leader of the gang, Mitchell excellently plays him with gusto and facility. But the film is a downer entombed in nostalgia and homesick (accentuated by Richard Hageman’s forlorn score) ever since the frothy gaiety is scuppered in the beginning, not least for the unexpected ending. Reckoned as the first Ford picture that deals with the ongoing WWII (though obliquely), THE LONG VOVAGE HOME’s pathos is rather different from the populist affirmation distilled from THE GRAPES OF WRATH, whereas the latter in a towering landmark in Ford’s estimable filmography, the former could only settle for a minor grade in juxtaposition.

    referential entries: Ford’s HOW GREEN WAS MY VALLEY (1941, 7.3/10); THE QUIET MAN (1952, 7.4/10); René Clément’s THE DAMNED (1947, 7.3/10).

    Title: The Grapes of Wrath
    Year: 1940
    Country: USA
    Language: English
    Genre: Drama
    Director: John Ford
    Screenwriter: Nunnally Johnson
    based on the novel by John Steinbeck
    Music: Alfred Newman
    Cinematography: Gregg Toland
    Editing: Robert L. Simpson
    Cast:
    Henry Fonda
    Jane Darwell
    John Carradine
    Dorris Bowdon
    Russell Simpson
    Charley Grapewin
    Zeffie Tilbury
    O.Z. Whitehead
    Eddie Quillan
    Frank Sully
    Darryl Hickman
    Shirley Mills
    Frank Darien
    John Qualan
    Grant Mitchell
    Ward Bond
    Roger Imhof
    Rating: 8.2/10

    Title: The Long Voyage Home
    Year: 1940
    Country: USA
    Language: English, Spanish
    Genre: Drama, War
    Director: John Ford
    Screenwriter: Dudley Nichols
    based on four plays by Eugene O’Neal
    Music: Richard Hageman
    Cinematography: Gregg Toland
    Editing: Sherman Todd
    Cast:
    John Wayne
    Thomas Mitchell
    Barry Fitzgerald
    Ian Hunter
    John Qualen
    Wilfrid Lawson
    Ward Bond
    Mildred Natwick
    Arthur Shields
    Joe Sawyer
    Douglas Walton
    Carmen Morales
    Rafaela Ottiano
    Constantine Romanoff
    Lee Shumway
    Billy Bevan
    Jack Pennock
    Rating: 7.0/10

     短评

    21/8/19

    4分钟前
  • 2046小马
  • 较差
  • 奥斯卡6项提名影片,包括最佳影片,改编自尤金·奥尼尔的戏剧,约翰·韦恩和巴里·菲茨杰拉德主演。看的是买CD送的DVD,一看是约翰·福特的作品,还是不好找的,果断收了,不过居然没中文字幕,这不科学。

    8分钟前
  • stknight
  • 还行
  • 福特是大形式大师,擅长使用综合符号和二元结构,但他小形式的杰作也不少,主要使用线索,《the long voyage hone》属于这种情况,飞机的攻击只通过声音来表现,大海的愤怒由床前的甲板头来表现。

    13分钟前
  • 阿尔伐
  • 力荐
  • 海员群像。托兰德。福特的被忽略的佳作

    14分钟前
  • chan
  • 推荐
  • 结局才是点睛之笔,它深化了这个看似平庸的故事,让我突然明白,这些船上的水手生活其实多么像如今发生在北上广等大城市那些打工人的故事——像欧利一样的人来来回回往返于故土和梦想之间,像德里斯科一样的人生生死死挣扎在生存和死亡的边缘,而大部分人像那些船员一样留下了他们带着血泪的记忆,一直循环往复那些机械化日常,真的可以算是一则伟大的寓言

    18分钟前
  • SunnyJoker
  • 还行
  • 烂番茄上评价奇高

    22分钟前
  • 震度4
  • 还行
  • 三星半,尽管电影的影棚气息极重,场景变换极少,依然透露着一种深邃的忧愁。很多伟大的思想往往都是最平凡的道理,这不是那些微信公众号浮夸的文案所能够带来的,重剑无锋,大巧不工。电影虽然拍摄于战争时期,讲的也是二战,但是却淡化了战争背景,而将镜头转向每一个有着过往的小人物。像欧里一样的人来来回回,如德里斯科一般的人生生死死“一个男人出航的时候,总要忘记他在陆地上的纠葛”

    27分钟前
  • Stardust
  • 推荐
  • 本着约翰福特这个导演去看,结果发现这个关于二战背景的电影一点也不英雄。本着约翰韦恩的这个明星去看,结果发现电影里其他演员的演技远远超过他。除了摄影以外,这是一部不像好莱坞的好莱坞电影。

    32分钟前
  • 爱德华大夫
  • 推荐
  • 天涯路远,归路迢迢。人性各异,津筏为喻!

    34分钟前
  • 禾一
  • 还行
  • 结局也太悲惨了。这在国内可能无法上映。

    38分钟前
  • 老土
  • 力荐
  • 底层海员的悲苦、艰辛和危险,特别是最后被骗、被劫、被绑架……能感受到剧作的严整和力量。

    43分钟前
  • 没头脑又不高兴
  • 还行
  • 本片本具有成为阿基尔、恐惧的代价等杰出影片的潜力,可惜在每个领域的执行都粗糙、单薄,封闭环境和单调生活对人物内心的影响完全没拍出来,生硬的对白和不可信的角色被塞在老套的故事里,最终成就了这部平庸之作。

    45分钟前
  • 惊奇少侠
  • 还行
  • 约翰·福特真正塑造了现代的《奥德赛》,这是一部鲜明而坚韧的电影,刻画人类为寻求和平而永无休止地在世间徘徊的故事,用现在的话说,他们也是一群出于各种原因在公海谋生的游牧民族。尤金·奥尼尔的原始剧本是在第一次世界大战期间撰写的,属于他的早期剧本。然而,福特把背景放置在第二次世界大战初期,电影评论家和学者注意到格雷格·托兰德(Gregg Toland)独特的摄影技术,这是黑色电影美学的先驱,并暗示了他为奥森·威尔斯的电影《公民凯恩》(1941)所做的工作。德勒兹认为这部电影是小形式的杰作,飞机的攻击只通过声音和甲板上的影子/弹孔来表示,而海浪从船的艏楼涌来则释放了大海的暴力。

    50分钟前
  • 彼得潘耶夫斯基
  • 推荐
  • 这时的韦恩居然一脸稚嫩 完全没有之后的老练成熟

    51分钟前
  • 刹那。
  • 还行
  • 这一部总的来说还是很有感触的,几个个性鲜明的船员因为一只船走到一起,却有着完全不同的结局,战争中的人们生死真的就在一线之间,这个看似喧嚣的故事实际上却悲凉无比,结局更是让人颤抖,约翰福特将这样一个故事拍成这样真的非常厉害。不过本片剧情还是弱了一点,8分电影

    55分钟前
  • 罚款时间y
  • 推荐
  • 说福特二战前的作品比二战后温和的肯定没看过这一部,悲凉的幽默感。黄金时代的导演都想复刻奥德赛,只有福特抓住了二十世纪精神,而不是虚假空洞的黄金城美国梦,就在于福特擅长的群像,清晰地完成那套社会结构论述。结尾对很多好莱坞影迷来说是当头泼下冷水,但我相信它是那个时代最佳电影结尾之一。浸在海里的报纸,易碎的主体性。摄影正是后一年《公民凯恩》的摄影格莱格托兰德,肉眼可辨啊!

    58分钟前
  • 1nL
  • 力荐
  • The lighting was revolutionary. Gregg Toland dared to use strong contrast. Fantastic.

    59分钟前
  • 多肉喜
  • 还行
  • 没有归途

    60分钟前
  • 安德烈卢布廖夫
  • 力荐
  • 约翰·福特与约翰·韦恩的再一次合作,不同于其他作品上的风格,这部电影似乎没有太过明显的主题与故事,几个海上水手的生活与航行构成了它的主线,背景很有意思,设置在“二战”中为英国盟军运输战略物资上。🚢🚢电影之所以会如此“模糊”正与它拍摄于1940年有关,那时的绝大部分电影都围绕战争展开,多以鼓舞盟军士气的故事为主。在本片中,导演尽量弱化了战争的元素,也仅仅在开始和接近结尾处出现了炸药和空袭。不可否认的是,它依然是一部风格明显的作品,更多关注战时平民们的生活和心理状态。🍺🍺约翰·韦恩则变得偏离以往的经典形象,甚至看起来更显年轻,戏份也不是很多,更多的镜头分配给了其他水手,可以说它描绘的是一幅众生相。🇺🇸🇺🇸

    1小时前
  • 几何乡
  • 还行
  • 不得了不得了,分三天反复看才看完影片的四幕,拍惯了大场面的福特居然在各种小空间的调度也能把握的游刃有余。|影片以航海生活为背景,来煽起福特擅长的小人物诗歌与悲调。影片的摄影与造型是同样出色的,歌舞戏、风卷浪、无实物空袭颇为精彩。或许因由潮湿的水汽,雾港,夜巷,高对比照明,影片同样透出noir的视觉风格(深焦的一种早期使用)。|似乎这是约翰·韦恩在福特系列中最惨的一个结局,依旧有着老白男冷冷的大叔幽默。2q

    1小时前
  • 杨小槑
  • 推荐
  • 返回首页返回顶部

    Copyright © 2023 All Rights Reserved