更像是可视化电影论文,如果有关键词的话那会是:paternal authority,gaze, materialism···里面一直提及的导演也是Hitchcock,Tarkovsky,Lynch。我会一直遗憾没有在最合适的时间去接触好莱坞电影(和动画片)。无论是穆尔维、齐泽克还是很多电影理论家都曾炫目于好莱坞的梦幻,因而有position去研究或批评,而我未曾沉浸过因而就世界电影版图来说缺失了一大半。以下为笔记关键词:
1、human voice:not a medium for expressing the depth of human subjectivity, but a foreign intruder.
2、partial objects: death drive.
the only way for me to get rid of this autonomous partial object is to become this object.
3、fiction:
sth shatters the coordinates of our reality. We have to fictionalise(虚构) it . So reality is in illusion.
We are installed within the symbolic order, so disintegrated us from the reality.
desire is a wound of reality and the reality can hurt the reality vice versa.(love is always mortifying love.)
precisely because I think it’s only a game, it’s only a persona, a self-image I adopt in virtual space, I can be there much more truthful. I can enact there an identity which is much closer to my true self.
It’s only in cinema that we get that crucial dimension which we are not ready to confront in our reality.
补充:象征界对想象界的侵入
4、transfer the emotion
press different buttons there and the appropriate emotions will be awakened in our mind.
5、form
It has a message of its own.
it is this background, this background of Porto-reality(原现实), a real which is more dense, more fundamental than the narrative reality, the story that we observe.
补充:亚里士多德认为事物的本质是凭借形式使得质料成为某种东西。形式让质料有了实质,事物的界限让他们有了形式。
黑格尔 《美学》: “美的要素可分为两种: 内在的,即内容; 另一种是外在的,即内容借以现出意蕴和特性的东西。
6、I know very well, but…
fetishist
最后,不要过度依赖精神分析,更不要以某理论家思考为圭臬,保持自我理性思考。
1.Dream
We escape into dream,to avoid a deadlock in our real life.but then,what we encounter in the dream is even more horrible,so that at the end,we literally escape from the dream. It starts with,dreams are for those who cannot endure,who are not strong enough for reality.It ends with,reality is for those who are not strong enough to endure,to confront their dreams.
人们在现实和梦境中来回逃离
2.enjoyment of sexual
The true enjoyment is not in doing it but in telling about it afterwards. Just arousing the fantasy and then rejecting the act results in utter psychological devastation. It is a case of a mental rape which can be worse than physical rape.
3. Anxiety
The only emotion which doesn’t deceive is anxiety. So the problem here is are we able to encounter in cinema the emotion of anxiety,or is cinema as such a fake?
4. Evil gaze
At the birds, the shot which taken as a neutral,God’s view shot,all of a sudden changes into an evil gaze.As if we are forced to act as a doll,as a tool of another evil divinity’s will.
5. Hitchcock
In Hitchcock,we have the motif of a person hanging from an abyss by the hand of another person. It’s wrong to look for a common,deeper meaning. Some French theorists claimed that what we are dealing here with is the motif of fall and redemption. I think that what we are dealing with is a kind of a cinematic materialism,that beneath the level of meaning,spiritual meaning but also simple narrative meaning,we get a more elementary level of forms themselves,communicating with each other,interacting,reverberating,echoing,morphing,transforming one into the other.
6. Paternal figures in David Lynch
I think that these ridiculous paternal figures are the ethical focus,the topic of practically all Lynch’s films.(that’s true) so these excessively ridiculous paternal figures,it’s not simply that they possess phallus,that they have phallus as the insignia of their authority,in a way,they immediately are phallus. And the provocative greatness of these Lynchian,obscene,paternal figures,is not only they don’t have any anxiety,not only they are not afraid of it,they fully enjoy being it. They are truly fearless entities beyond life and death,gladly assuming their immortality,their non-castrated life energy.
7. The law and judgement
The law is not only severe,ruthless,blind,at the same time,it mocks us. There is an obscene pleasure in practicing the law. Pluto’s judgement day,a truly Stalinist political trial. Stalin who personifies communist austerity,terror and musicals. The answer again is the psychoanalytic notion of superego. Superego is not only excessive terror,unconditional injunction,demand of utter sacrifice,but at the same time,obscenity,laughter.
8. What’s the source of chaplain’s comic genius?
It’s being mistaken for somebody or functioning as a disturbing spot,as a disturbing stain.
9. Love in city lights
A poor man who loves a beautiful blind girl. This is the metaphor of our predicament. All too often,when we love somebody, we don’t accept him or her as what the person effectively is. We accept him or her insofar as this person fits the co-ordinations of our fantasy. We misidentify him or her,which is why,when we discover that we were wrong,love can quickly turn into violence. There is nothing more dangerous,more lethal for the loved person than to be loved,as it were,for not what he or she is,but for fitting the ideal. In this case,love is always mortifying love.
爱情总是在抑制爱情
爱人=爱自己
看这部电影花了我好几天,其中一个很重要的原因是我听齐泽克说话会莫名很紧张,甚至透不过气,搞得我理解能力都慢了半拍。
英国女导演索菲亚·菲尼斯执导,由斯拉沃热·齐泽克精心炮制的纪录片《变态者电影指南》《变态者意识形态指南》,显现一种孤独求败的意志,这同样也是一种忘我的竭诚。只有真正沉下心来去做一件事,人才显得无欲无求。
当齐泽克穿越希区柯克的电影来到卓别林的世界,当《窥探者》遭遇《异形》,所谓变态者不过弗洛伊德学说中一枚空落的棋子,或者反弗洛伊德而行之,弗洛伊德又成了神经病患者的一剂创口贴。拉康精神分析理论与马克思主义哲学,只是这位学术明星口中的“真知灼见”,那些经典影像成了他手中随意扣动的扳机,想打到哪就打到哪。即便没一个准星的,也得承认他那种异常亢奋又怪神乱入的总括能力。
人若真心诚意地研究一件事,灵感迸发的机率也就会大大增加。从这两部走马观花的探究中,看到了齐泽克的执着。从中不遗余力地推演继而产生悟道之觉,这是我对此片情趣盎然的缘由之一。只是觉得齐泽克对于所述电影,难免有一种感觉先行的直白,过于表面的浮光掠影,或触摸不到电影的实质,但自话自说也好过人云亦云。
在这里,“变态者”只不过是齐泽克反传统的借故,更多的是其想当然的格式化。更何况齐泽克所述的变态者,已超越我们所理解的一般个体概念,而一旦与意识形态混合联姻,这样的影像就注定能扭成了一团乱麻,余波之后又有某种说不明的失落。搅得风生水起的变态者,与所述的电影,往往有点儿风马牛不相及,也可能是齐泽克故弄悬殊的圈套。
注定如齐泽克这样的学者成不了殉道者,他也只是四处游荡的凑个热闹而已。多一个解析电影的视角,未尝不是个好事,容我以后再详加细看。粗阅观感只是一块未加琢磨的原石,得花更多时间细心触摸,这才更接近这两部片子的本质,否则,与盲人摸象无异。
2015、1、8
教科书 教科书~
这部主要是希胖、老塔、Kieslowski和林奇,齐泽克说他们的电影都有一种形式的自治(autonomy of cinematic form)。因为这些人的电影在这一年的reading和paper中都出现频率很高,握着各种其它approaches再来看psychoanalysis的分析,觉得这个approach虽然总不被正统承认,但自有一种自由在里面> <
藏娇记 黑客帝国 群鸟 惊魂记 驱魔人 异形 大独裁者 穆赫兰道 搏击俱乐部 蓝丝绒 迷魂记 大开眼界 我心狂野 钢琴教师 狗镇 绿野仙踪 后窗 弗洛伊德的精神分析还有那意大利口音的英语。
完美,但part 2開始字幕就開始不對位,惆悵。這絕對是學電影必看的影片,其實很多影片都有哲學依據,久聞齊澤克的大名,果真是拉康的弟子。讓我對多很多經典的電影場景有了全新認識。
听起来过瘾因为我身边没有人能这样和我聊电影理论的部分 而我太期待有谁能够拿他/她的知识储备砸得我头晕耳鸣眼里掉出佩服的小星星//通俗还是通俗的//经过一美的口音洗礼我以为我能大概听懂一些重口音但是我错了
齐泽克的难得之处在于:愿意蹲下来对你说话,摆实例,把援引出处都标好,把饭喂到你嘴边。然而即使这样,还有人嫌饭不合口味。
它真的是一部纪录片吗?纪录了什么?一种形而上哲思,一种较赫尔佐格的自然—激情更为抽象,更波普的哲思?外加闯入视域的罗夏墨迹图式或试图闯入电影片段中的齐泽克?等等,这莫不是戈达尔后期"论文电影"?齐泽克:"纪录片"与"戈达尔"不过是你的幻想,我的"纪实"影像胜过你所谓之"真实"
这些电影果然都是本人的心头爱,难道我真的是pervert……什么是真实什么是虚构,齐泽克也没有给我答案
比起齐泽克的行文,他的口音根本不算是理解障碍了。
唉,人家也是学术明星,但人家真的是才华横溢啊。。。。。咱国内的学术明星要学习啊
呵呵呵。第一次這麼深切的感受到:拉岡與齊澤克的文本批評如果沒有學理脈絡只取結果來講,有多麼讓外人感覺是胡說八道!
电影和哲学结合,像看书一样.镜像,凝视,大他者,小对形.(十个影评加上短评)
用精神分析讲电影。不管是对弗洛伊德还是对于电影都有一些不那么俗套的观点。虽然主要是胡扯,但是胡扯往往能牵出隐藏在表象下的真实。有时觉得齐这样的人物还是必须存在的。只有像他这样备受关注的学术明星,才能用他对事物的敏感,去填补那些缺乏洞察力的中产阶级以及社会精英们的思维和想像。
知识层面先于观看层面,影像只是素材,电影其实是一门阐释学。
这是借电影说心理学吧?术语太多了,好多句子不暂停想一下根本理解不能,剪了那么多电影做例子还是枯燥得让人看不下去
t31838af4完全不枯燥,看过的电影深层复习了一遍
齐泽克真是能说。。。充满夸夸其谈的江湖骗子气息。。。翻来覆去讲的都是那些东西。。。整部片子就是在满足他个人的表演欲和那个叫什么口淫欲吧。。。。
听一个言之有物的人滔滔不绝真是世界上最幸福的事!就是齐泽克这个重口音英语啊。听他上课不知道什么感觉。电影名挺炫酷,其实本身是个很学术的分析类影片(甚至不知道叫不叫纪录片),有许多希区柯克和大卫林奇,集中讲电影的性隐喻,我是理论门外汉也能看得津津有味,讲得还是通俗有趣的
Lynch分析得太到位了。这一套方法处理黑泽明,戈达尔等超我异常强大的作者有难度
齐泽克的这套精神分析法在林奇和希区柯克那里得以大显身手,而在许多好莱坞作品上则涉嫌架构空中楼阁。很多时候他的分析背离了电影本身,曲解了诸多电影语言本身。整部分析最精彩的部分在最后,他呼吁我们在电影的虚拟影像里去寻找“真实”,亦即某种“前叙事”的“形式”。而作为马克思唯物主义者,他依据卢卡契和巴赫金而断言,时间即是这物质性的形式。尽管我不太支持他的论证,但结论还是很让人受用的。